The Digital Age of Education

In his article, Listen to the Natives, Marc Prensky makes a compelling case for redefining how we teach in order to address a new generation of learners. He describes these learners as digital natives who are so technologically literate that they're beyond our scope of teachability. His outlook is so absurd that I have a hard time taking his writing seriously. For example, he states, "we can no longer use our 20th century knowledge or our training as a guide to what is best for them educationally." 


I believe in the core knowledge philosophy of teaching. I think students need to have basic knowledge and experience to advance their thinking and problem solving skills. Using technology as a medium to teach can be effective. However, I don't think it is realistic to expect technology to replace traditional methods or teachers. Prensky suggests, "We need more radical solutions. For example, students could learn algebra far more quickly and effectively if instruction were available in game format." I am very skeptical of how gaming actually builds original thought processes and problem solving skills. Repetitive game formats provide instant feedback and gratification but can't stretch the mind the way a teacher can. Incremental success in video games is what keeps kids addicted to progressing to new levels. Their skill level reflexes and speed increases but not new thought processes. However, I think technology can be used to augment a student's core knowledge and background experience in a given subject.


There will always be a place for traditional schools and methods of teaching. Students who are using advanced technology aren't smarter than teachers of today because they've become adept in using what I'll call novelty items. In fact, I would suggest it is the devices that are smarter, i.e. "the smartphone" and not the student. Basic problem solving methods can be used at all levels of learning and are best taight through teachers. Educators are able to differentiate children according to talents and strengths whereas, technology cannot identify or challenge a student's potential.